beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.21 2016나50174

물품대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following dismissal or addition, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be removed or added;

(a)in Part 3, Part 10 of the Judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be added:

“F. On October 8, 2013, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to prepare a trading statement in accordance with the trading specification form stating “Edib Information and Communications Co., Ltd., Ltd., to be supplied” rather than a scarcity for parts entered into the address of Sungjin.”

B. Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 11 (f) of the first instance court, the Defendant shall be “(f).” The Defendant shall be “g.”, and the 3rd part “Evidence 1 through 15 of the A” shall be read as “Evidence 1 through 19 of the A.”

C. Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court provides that “No contact or consultation has been made with employees of the Sungjin” shall be deemed as follows: “The Plaintiff, rather than the trading specification sheet used by the Plaintiff when supplied to the new e-mail, prepares a trading list for the parts sent by the Defendant in accordance with the trading specification form sent by the Defendant.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the defendant.