For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the instant facts charged (excluding the part concerning interference with each business of January 12, 2016, the part concerning the damage to property of February 3, 2017, and the part concerning the injury of January 2, 2017).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules without exhaust all necessary deliberations, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the wrongful act of a political party and self-help as a reason for the exclusion of illegality, the presumption and implied consent in the crime of forging private documents, force in the crime of obstruction of business, intent of causing property damage, and intent of embezzlement and intent of unlawful acquisition.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.