Defendant

A and Defendant B were under the influence of alcohol from the front door of the apartment house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from September 29, 2019 to 16:20, while the victim D (Nam, 37 years of age) was under the influence of alcohol from the front door of the apartment house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendants got off the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the Defendant B, who was under the influence of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, and carried out sexual action.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1.Each investigation report;

1. The written statement [the defendants and their defense counsel argued that the defendants were in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. Thus, even if the defendants were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime, it is difficult to recognize that the defendants were in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder at the time of the crime in light of the law and the content of the crime. Thus, the above argument

1. Relevant Articles 245 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 245 and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who is to suspend the sentence: A fine of one million won, and Defendant B: fine of five hundred thousand won;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants reflect their mistakes in depth, Defendant A has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, Defendant B has no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, Defendant B is the first offender, the Defendants appears to have committed the instant crime contingently, the place where the crime was committed is behind the vehicle, and the risk of

1. Defendants as to whether they are subject to orders to complete education: the main sentence of Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (it shall not be imposed in the case of postponement of sentence). Personal information registration, disclosure order,