The defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental fissionability.

1. Around 16:00 on December 20, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim D(30 years of age) with a view to taking the victim’s gate, walking the victim’s gate, walking the victim’s gate, and taking the victim’s gate face back, taking the victim’s gate face back, etc., without any particular reason.

2. Around 16:00 on December 20, 2014, the Defendant damaged the property by making it difficult for the Defendant to cut off the cate club in front of the cate-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and without any particular reason, the cate-type car owned by the victim E, which was parked in the place without any specific reason.

3. On December 20, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as taking off the face of the said G by hand, when she was sent to the site after receiving a report from 112, among the 16:10 on the front of the consortium clubs located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Sinsan-si, on December 20, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G and D;

1. Entry of the E-document;

1. Application of each video statute to records of photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Articles 10 (2) and (1) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act, which are legally mitigated;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine of one million won to be imposed on the suspension of sentence;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.