When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 22:50 on September 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was drunkly under the influence of alcohol in the “Criju” located in Hanam-si B and 2; (b) the police officer belonging to the D District Unit, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, told the Defendant that “I would like to see if I would like to drink, I would like to say I would like to read “I would like to see I would like to do so, I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to see I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like to walk I would like again while I would like to go through D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;