At around 01:10 on December 26, 2014, the Defendant was punished for trial costs as a matter of payment of taxi charges in the vicinity of the residence of a public official who was a public official in Ulsan-gu B-gu, Ulsan-gu, and as a matter of payment of taxi charges.

12 Around the Ulsan Central Police Station D District District E, who was called to the site after receiving a report, sent out to the site, in order to enable the defendant to calculate the taxi fee and return home from the defendant, and to gather the fryto the above E and to use the face in both hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report 112 by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to criminal facts - Selection of fines (Consideration of the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime and confession, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;