However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the execution of punishment shall be suspended.

A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with a Special Self-Governing Province Governor or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering fee-charging job placement services to the competent authorities, operated the term “B” under the mutual name “B” without registering the fee-charging job placement services, waiting for entertainment reception service providers, such as C and D, and asked for a fee-charging job placement service to provide a service for entertainment reception service, upon the request to send entertainment reception service workers from the operators of singing rooms and singings, etc., the Defendant, upon receiving KRW 5,000 per hour from the said helpers, received an entertainment reception service under the pretext of a fee-charging job placement service.

At around 04:40 on February 29, 2016, the Defendant received a request from the proprietor of the “G entertainment drinking house” located in the F of Macheon City, to send entertainment reception workers, and introduced entertainment reception workers D and C to the said entertainment drinking house, and received 5,000 won per person from the above entertainment reception workers, and conducted fee-charging job placement services without registering fee-charging job placement services with the competent authority from September 29, 2015 to February 29, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

C. Each statement of the police with D, each statement of the call, list of entertainment taverns, and application of the law to the telephone number

1. Relevant Article 47 of the Employment Security Act and Articles 47 subparagraph 1 and 19 (1) of the Employment Security Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

3. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

4. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1)2 and (2) of the Criminal Act (a statement that the monthly average income from the court has been clearly set forth to an extent of two million won) is that the Defendant has been subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime for a long time, but has been sentenced four times due to the same type of crime, and it is not good that the Defendant has not suspended the operation of the sidewalk and has repeatedly committed the crime for several months.

However, the defendant erred.