2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant did not have any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine; (b) the Defendant was favorable to the Defendant; (c) the amount of the instant fraud was heavy and did not have been restored to the present time; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime with the victims known to the long time; (c) the Defendant neglected the trust with the victims; (d) the victims attempted to commit the instant crime; and (e) the victims want to be punished for the Defendant; and (e) other circumstances constituting the conditions of sentencing, such as the background, means, results, and conditions after the instant crime, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.