beta
(영문) 부산가정법원 2017.1.12.선고 2016드단8943 판결

이혼

Cases

2016dward8943 Divorce

Plaintiff

Article 00 (Lifelong in 1962)

Busan Address

reference domicile Gyeong-nam

Defendant

Article 40 (Rights, etc.)

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

reference domicile Gyeong-nam

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 22, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

January 12, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim

The order is as set forth in the text.

Due to this reason

The whole pleadings are made on each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 11 (including branch numbers, if any)

In light of the purport, the plaintiff and the defendant are legally married couple who reported their marriage on August 19, 1988, and they are slickly married couple.

The fact that there are two adult children, and the defendant does not pay living expenses for ten years from the beginning of marriage.

In fact, from time to time, the defendant has been absent from the game gambling within the marriage period, and the defendant has taken home life,

Until April 11, 2014, I draw up to the plaintiff a letter that no game gambling will be carried out for an absolute reason.

After that, the Defendant continued to engage in the game gambling in another way even if he had ordered it, and from January 2016, the Defendant was from around January 2016.

It can be recognized that living expenses have not been paid to the plaintiff.

In addition, the defendant does not give any answer to the plaintiff's claim for divorce.

In addition to the circumstances, the source that should be based on patriotism and trust, and the defendant's marriage shall be avoided.

It is reasonable to deem that an intentional fault has occurred to the extent that it is impossible to recover.

This constitutes a cause for judicial divorce under Article 840, Article 840, Article 840, subparagraph 2 and 6 of the Civil Code.

Therefore, the plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim for divorce of this case shall be accepted on the ground of the reasons, and it is so ordered as per Disposition.

this decision is delivered.

Judges

Judges Park Jong-sung