beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.01.25 2018나41860

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

15 pages 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be as follows: "as shown after the whole verification of the documents," "as shown in the table after the whole verification of the documents."

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. 1) At the time of concluding the instant sales contract, the Plaintiffs believed and purchased the Defendants with the belief that there was no defect in the facilities related to the instant building. However, ① among the instant buildings, the Plaintiffs spent KRW 3,714,18 in the installation of the Plaintiffs because they did not have automatic fire reduction equipment at the “I” store located on the fourth and the “J Institute” store located on the sixth and the fourth and fourth floors. ② The elevator of the instant building is not operated on the underground floor; ② the elevator of the instant building is not operated on the upper floor, and the elevator is not operated on the upper floor in the case of the second and upper floors; ③ the Defendants were parking lots on the underground floor, and the Defendants were allowed to park four vehicles at the time of the instant sales contract, but it is impossible for the Plaintiffs to park the above 4 vehicles, and thus, it is necessary to install 11,468,600 won in the instant building with the total of KRW 108,160 in the instant building and KRW 1860 in the instant building,700.