When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around 20:50 on October 12, 2018, the Defendant issued an order to the victim D (the 17-year old-old) who is an employee of the Defendant ordering the c'C's 'C' located in Jari-gun, Jari-gun to pay the c's dyp of coffee, and made the payment by using the c's dyp of coffee in the paper transport unit in which the c's dyp was first put into the c's dyp of the c' and the c's dyp of the c's dyp of the c'. The Defendant added the c's dyp of the c's dyp of the c' to the dyp of the dyp of the c' to the dyp of the dyp of the dyp of the dyp.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. A interference with the business of the Defendant asserted that the said employee D and the victim E, the owner of the said coffee store, unlike the time and time like the Defendant’s order at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, expressed the Defendant’s desire to take the part in the larger urine, such as “spawn” and “spawn”, and obstructed the victim’s operation of the coffee store by force from around 21:10 minutes to around 21:10 of the same day by avoiding the disturbance, such as where the instant employee D and the said coffee sales store (hereinafter “spawn”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of special violence), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the instant case.