If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On April 25, 2013, from around 01:40 to 03:10 on April 25, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s letter or business by force by force, by making it impossible for customers, who were at risk of entering the scene, to enter the scene of a disturbance, such as making a false statement to the effect that they were unable to enter the scene, on the ground that they were subjected to a rejection of their opinions to the effect that they would not have a letter or position.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to 112 Incident reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a contingent crime for sentencing of the provisional payment order, and the victim expressed his intention to not pay punishment in the court.