If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

On October 19, 2016, at around 17:55, the Defendant, while driving a Datoba on the front of the Matoba-dong, in front of the Maba-dong, in front of the Maba-dong, proceeded in violation of the signal and demanded the E to present his identification card, the Defendant, stating, “I”, “I kba-man, kba-man, kba-man, kba-man, knba-man, kba-man.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, violated the signal while driving Oral cliba, and attempted the hand of the crackdown police officer.

However, the defendant is suffering from mental fission, and the crime of this case seems to have been committed under the lack of decision-making ability due to the above mental disorder.

In addition, the degree of assault by the defendant is not severe and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account such circumstances and the defendant's age, occupation, sex, the details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.