If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 14, 2017, at the court of Suwon District Court No. 210, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath against the injury case against the said court No. 2017 No. 4057, Dec. 14, 2017, the Defendant responded to the question, “A witness (Defendant) of the said B’s defense counsel (“Is the witness”) to “Is that Is the process of opening and talking with the Defendant (B on July 29, 2016)” and “Is the witness to answer to the question, “Is the witness who, at the time, had the Defendant finished talk from the time when Is with the Defendant and continued to move with the witness and D”, and “Is no question whether there was a fact that the Defendant had the victim’s price at drinking.”

The answer is that “I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see I would like to see that I would like to see I would like to see if I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see that I would like to open a door and open a window, and that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see I would like to see that I would like to see

The answer, “If the window was opened, the figure at which the person was at the time of the window,” may not be seen to have clearly judged how the person was at the time of the price at the bar.

It is also required to think that the author continued to see and report, but it is not absolute to see.

I reply to “(B)” and go to the question “(B) if I am on the first page of the date when I consider the witness’s return to the presiding judge.”

As a result, the question of “I am to see from the beginning of the witness,” “I am to open a window so that I am to this end, and to this end.”