beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단3021

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 6, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on August 6, 2010, and was released on October 28, 201 during the execution of the sentence in the Busan Detention House on October 28, 201 and the parole period expired on February 12, 2012.

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On July 2012, the Defendant acquired money in the name of the deposit money from the victim C who had known from around April 2012 to his knowledge of the business name in Busan City, and received a statement from the victim C, who had known from around April 2012 to his knowledge of the business name in the city of Busan, and managed the D apartment constructed by entrustment from the head office to the victim.

It was said that the inside of the Republic of Korea could where abundled a director."

However, the defendant did not have been entrusted with the management of the above apartment, and there was no idea that he would receive deposit from the injured party to deliver it to the head office instead of deposit money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was issued KRW 65,00,000,000 on July 11, 2012, under the name of deposit for the lease deposit for the above apartment unit from the injured party who belongs to the above false end, and received KRW 65,000,000 for three occasions on July 31, 2012, and KRW 29,000 on August 29, 2012, respectively.

B. On July 2012, the Defendant shall acquire money in the name of monthly rent and borrowed money, and “2002 No. 2002 shall be the victim’s residence of the victim of Suwon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City apartment D apartment B, 2002.

It is expected to move to the 17th floor after several months, as the former has come to the latter.

There is a lack of business funds to carry out construction works, such as hospital interior in various places, such as Seoul and the Gyeongdong, at the present time.

In the event that the construction cost is paid after the quasi-public offering, the payment is to be made at once.”

However, the Defendant, as stated in the above Paragraph A, was in the state of deceiving the victim as if he were managing the apartment as stated in the said Paragraph, and received from the injured party about the said apartment No. 2002 instead of monthly rent.