대여금
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff for KRW 70,450,970 and KRW 35,977,736 among them. < Amended by Act No. 1280, Apr. 11, 2014>
1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 7, Gap evidence No. 8-1 through 3 as to the plaintiff's claim, and the whole purport of the argument, the plaintiff transferred to the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor the claims as stated in the attached Form No. 7 against the defendants on June 24, 2014, and notified the defendants of the assignment of claims on July 17, 2014, and recognized the fact that the notice was delivered at that time. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.
2. Determination on the claims of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor
A. On June 24, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claims indicated in the separate sheet against the Defendants on June 24, 2014, and notified the Defendants of the assignment of claims on July 17, 2014.
(b) Grounds for recognition: Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);