2. Although the Defendant led the Defendant to commit a crime, the Defendant continued to repeat the crime even after having been sentenced to six times the previous convictions, and even after having been sentenced to both the previous and the previous punishment, the instant crime was committed by not much much time after having been released from the prison. In light of the Defendant’s criminal records, the possibility of repeating a crime seems to be considerable since it was impossible to find out the Defendant’s intention to stop a crime. In full view of all other factors of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.