2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the U.S. Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”), entered the Republic of Korea for a stay status of general visa (30 days during the stay period) and stayed beyond the period of stay, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on March 11, 2015.

B. On September 14, 2015, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee non-recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no “a well-founded fear of persecution,” which is a requirement for refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees,” which is a requirement for refugee status.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said application was dismissed on May 31, 2016.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is an opposing position against the government and the Muslim-type group of Egypt when he knows that Egypt's whole regime is, and there is sufficient concern that Egypt will be stuffed when he returns to the Republic of Korea, and it is a reasonable fear. However, the disposition of this case which did not recognize it on different premise is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion,” even if all evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff were considered, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① In the interview and investigation, the Plaintiff did not specifically state the details of the threat experienced by the Plaintiff, and only made a very vague statement, and the contents of the statement are entirely written.