2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On November 23, 2008, when the Defendant was working as a director and a representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”), he retired from the director and the representative director, and on March 5, 2009, he was appointed to the inside director and the representative director, and on January 4, 2010, the Defendant retired from the representative director.

B. Around June 2006, the Plaintiff was employed as a director or a representative director on November 24, 2006 after becoming a member of the Defendant Company D, which was run by the Defendant, and was employed as an employee of the instant company after the instant company was merged into D and succeeded to employment. On March 5, 2009, the Plaintiff was appointed as an internal director of the instant company and was appointed as the representative director on January 4, 2010, but was dismissed from office on August 21, 2014.

C. On August 29, 2014, the Defendant is in office as the representative director of the instant company, who is in office.

Meanwhile, the total number of shares issued by the instant company is 200,000 shares.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant on August 2009 that “the Plaintiff operates the instant company by taking office as the representative director of the instant company since 2010, and the Plaintiff’s management right is guaranteed for at least five years, and the Defendant transferred 34% of the shares of the instant company to the Plaintiff when the Plaintiff only operates the company. When the Defendant, a major shareholder, intends to obtain a new management right, he/she shall compensate the Plaintiff twice the average share price for the two years prior to the pertinent year (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(A) The attached contract agreement (No. 2, hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”) which arranged the above agreement at the end of the same month.

was drawn up.

On January 4, 2010, according to the instant agreement, the Plaintiff was appointed to the representative director of the instant company, and operated the company with its original intent by expanding its sales and net profit, and the Defendant’s term of office.