The judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act). The part of the claim against Defendant C and D asserted that the Plaintiff guaranteed the Plaintiff’s obligation to return the instant loan after lending KRW 59,000,000 to B on March 6, 2008 (hereinafter “instant loan”). As such, as to whether the Defendants concluded a guarantee contract with the Plaintiff, health class and evidence No. 1 are difficult to be considered as evidence because there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity between the Defendants and the Plaintiff, and there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it solely on the basis of each of the evidence No. 2 and No. 3.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C and D is accepted, and all claims against the defendant C and D are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.