However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Records] On August 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Northern District Court for embezzlement, etc., and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2018.

[2] The Defendant, on September 20, 2017, of the 2018 High Order 702, is a group of persons who borrow money on the security of a vehicle from the victim F in the E coffee shop located near subway D No. 1 in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu.

Since various documents are received when lending a vehicle as security, it is not easy to lurged from money because the risk does not occur at all.

If money is invested in money, 5% interest per month shall be paid on the security of the vehicle.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and the profit to the victim because he/she thought that he/she will receive money from the victim to use it as personal debt repayment and Internet gambling.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim as above, acquired a total of 3.6 million won from the victim on September 25, 2017, 27.2 and 1.7 million won on the same month, 5.3 million won on the 28th of the same month, and 9.6 million won on November 4 of the same year.

"2018 Highest 1822"

1. On June 29, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the exercise of the right by concealing the said vehicle, which was the object of the victim’s right, to “H” as a collateral for the Defendant’s other debt security, in a case where: (a) on the said vehicle on June 30, 2015, the Defendant received a loan of KRW 8,000,000,000, from the victim, the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Group Co., Ltd. on the second floor of the building; and (b) granted a mortgage of KRW 8,00,000 on the said vehicle on June 30, 2015; (c) on January 30, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s exercise of the right by concealing the said vehicle, which was the object of the victim’s right, as a collateral for the Defendant’

2. Where a person who has acquired an automobile in violation of the Automobile Management Act intends to transfer it again to a third party, he/she shall make a registration of transfer in his/her name before transferring it, and if not, he/she shall sell and sell it.