퇴직금 등 청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The scope of the trial in this Court claimed for the payment of unpaid coverage expenses and retirement allowances in the first instance court, and the court of first instance dismissed all the Plaintiff’s claim.
It is evident that the Plaintiff filed an appeal only for the portion of the claim for retirement benefits in the judgment of the first instance, and this court has waived the claim as to the portion of the claim, which is premised on the application of the progressive retirement payment system under the collective agreement by 2006 among the claims for retirement benefits, and sought unpaid retirement benefits due to the failure to pay the average wage for coverage expenses.
Therefore, the part of the claim for unpaid retirement allowance due to the failure to pay the average wage of the coverage subsidy is subject to the judgment of this court.
2. Basic facts
A. Defendant Company has been established for the purpose of publishing and selling newspapers, and publishing and selling books and magazines, and has been engaged in the business of publishing and selling C Newspaper, a daily newspaper, and publishing and selling D, E, etc.
B. On July 1, 1988, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company as a career editor and served as a reporter of the DNA editing department in the weekly bureau. From December 2, 2011, the Plaintiff was retired on September 30, 2015 while serving as a day-time E editor in the weekly E editing department.
C. Defendant Company paid coverage coverage costs to reporters (hereinafter referred to as the Vice-President of the Editorial Department and the Vice-President of the News Agency, excluding editing department and the Sub-President of the Editorial Department, and paid coverage costs to reporters (hereinafter referred to as the Vice-President of the Editorial Department and the Sub-President of the Editorial Department).
On September 1, 2011, the Defendant Company raised the expense for news gathering on September 1, 201, at KRW 500,000 per month for editing (except for editing, editing, teaching, design reporters), news service, and D news reporters, at KRW 1,00,00 per month, and at KRW 70,000 per month in the case of news reporters.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff received monthly coverage subsidization costs while working as above, and it receives KRW 1 million per month from September 1, 201, when working as a reporter of D editing unit. E.