beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.31 2017고단6457

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment by obstructing business operations in Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of punishment on July 21, 2017.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 6457

1. From around 03:30 on August 27, 2017 to around 04:30 on the same day, the Defendant, who interfered with his duties, drinks alcoholic beverages at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with his/her table attached to the floor, fastens the drinking bottle on his/her table with the floor, and kills two customers E, etc.

"At the end of the year of reporting to the width," the author expressed his/her desire to do so, and avoided the disturbance for about one hour, and make customers in the place get out of the facility.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On September 24, 2017, around 17:10 on September 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) informed of the road in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and had a dispute with the victim G (n, 47 years of age); (b) caused a dangerous object, such as a type, light, which was a dangerous object left on the alley and left on the alleyway, and (c) caused the victim to display the victim’s light on the right edge of the treatment days by taking the shape, light, etc., suitable for the victim’s right edge, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

"2018 Highest 1289"

3. On February 22, 2018, at around 16:50, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force, under the “J” operated by the victim I in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H market, for the reason that the Defendant was deprived of her desire to boom the front of the front wheelchairs of the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was placed in his/her place of view, thereby interfering with the victim’s business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each written statement C, E, and I;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (formers and confirmations);

1. Criminal facts;