However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 27, 2016, around 22:25, 2016, the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife imposed the Victim E (59) and trial expenses on the front of “D” on the road located in “D” in “C”, and they were in dispute. B, the Defendant kept the victim’s face by hand over the floor with his hand.

Then, after the victim took the floor from the floor, breaking the B's bridge up to the floor, and B breaking the container around the floor, and breaking the body part of the victim's head by gathering the container and gathering the victim's hand, and the defendant dupbling the victim's head by hand. The defendant dupe one cement gate, which is a dangerous object in the vicinity of the victim's entrance, duplicating with the victim's flapsing, and the victim dup the cement gate, which is a dangerous object in the vicinity of the above "D," and the victim walked the part of the victim's body, walking the part of the victim's body, which goes beyond the beam, and then the victim dup the body part of the victim's head by the cement duplicing.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles with B and jointly carried them, and the victim suffered two straws in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B or E by the police;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;