2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

The defendant is a holder of BDwegian car.

In spite of the fact that the owner of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the defendant

A. A. On December 13, 2009, at around 01:45, the pertinent passenger car that was not covered by mandatory insurance prior to the 211-dong, Seopong-dong, Busan, Seopyeong-dong, Busan, and:

B. On March 1, 2010, around 23:52, the pertinent passenger car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance in front of the Kukdong-gu, Busan, Seogdong-dong, Busan, is operated;

C. On March 11, 2010, around 00:23, the pertinent passenger car was operated, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, in front of the Kukdong-gu, Busan, Seodong-dong, Seodong-gu, Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiries into mandatory insurance contracts and the application of statutes governing non-insurance operations;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012) concerning criminal facts;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.