However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CT car.

On October 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 60km per hour from the 21:45 on October 10, 2013 to the 3-distance intersection in front of the Ecrypt D located in the Ecrypt in the ecryp.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at one-lane from the occupational negligence of the victim F (72 years old, South) who would turn to the left normally by receiving the left-hand turn at one-lane of the opposite contractual negligence while violating the signal while leaving the stop signal, and received the front part of the driver’s seat on the side of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim and the victim H (the age of 66, female) who was on board the victim’s vehicle due to the foregoing accident, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F and H;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A H statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (Evidence Nos. 9, 10) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant is the primary offender, the fact that the Defendant is subscribed to a comprehensive automobile insurance policy, the victims are not injured, and the sentencing guidelines do not apply as they fall under recommended concurrent crimes based on sentencing guidelines.

General traffic accident area(the injury caused by traffic accident)(one to six months) shall be reduced.