관리비
1. The Defendant’s KRW 63,890,730 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from February 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016.
According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and 10, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the witness Eul's testimony, the plaintiff is a controlled entity that performs the business of managing and maintaining the building entrusted by the Commercial Building Number C (hereinafter "the building of this case"), which is one condominium building, by the Commercial Building Number Association of Dongducheon-si (hereinafter "the building of this case"), and the defendant purchased the 4 to 6 stories of the building of this case from the auction (the Government District Court D) on July 20, 209, and operated the parking lot at this place (hereinafter "the parking lot of this case"), ② the plaintiff concluded an entrustment contract with the commercial building of this case on Jan. 31, 2007, and did not receive management fees from the defendant Nos. 1601, Oct. 16, 2019, 2001.
However, in light of the details of the management expenses, expenditure items, and characteristics of the commercial condominium building, which require integrated management, the management expenses can be deemed expenses incurred in the direct maintenance and management of the common area as well as electricity fees, etc. incurred in the entire common area of the building of this case, or ultimately, expenses incurred in the integrated maintenance and management of the aggregate building for the whole interests of the occupants.
In this context, each sectional owner shall share a common area, unless there are special circumstances to the contrary, in accordance with the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings.