Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 21, 2014, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that the Defendant purchased a secondhand cell phone as “B” on the NAV bulletin board, and that the Defendant would pay the price for the goods immediately after receiving the goods. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s mobile phone message to the effect that the Defendant would sell the Defendant’s mobile phone 5 and the Gakaoooooooo Kaooooo Kaoooooooo Kaoooo Kaoooo Kaoo Kao Kaoo Kaoo Kao Kao Kaoo Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao, which reads “five mobile phone 190,000 won,” and received the goods.

However, the fact that there was no intention to pay the price even after the victim received the above mobile phone from the victim.

On November 26, 2014, at around 21:25, the Defendant received from the victim a mobile phone of gallon C, North-gu C, 208 Dong 403, the Defendant’s residence of the Defendant, and a gallon C, 203 mobile phone.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;