A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

A is the owner of the E Gameland in Busan Dongdong-gu, and the defendant B is the head of the above Gameland.

From June 25, 2012 to July 12:50, 2012, the Defendants conspired and provided 20 players with the game software rating committee for the use of the game software in the above E-Gameland by installing 20 game software players, which opened and altered Mato-si 20 game software players to select only their answers in a certain section and select only their answers, different from the contents rated by the E-Game.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants: (a) the crime of this case committed by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act is highly harmful to the society, such as promoting a speculative spirit of ordinary people and failing to cooperate in home economy; and (b) there is a need to strictly punish the Defendants; and (c) there is a favorable circumstance for the Defendants, such as the Defendants’ misunderstanding of and against the mistakes; and (d) there is no criminal record of the same kind

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances, the motive, background, means and methods of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and other circumstances revealed in the pleadings of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, career, and environment, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.