In the event that the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, each of them is 100.

The facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not infringe on the defendant's substantial right of defense.

On December 8, 2015, the Defendants discussed the issues such as Defendant B’s attitude of the Defendants on the part of Defendant B’s her mother E (the 48-year old age), and F (the 46-year age) on the part of Defendant B’s male her mother G with the Defendant’s male her mother, and the Defendants’ attitude against the her mother, etc. on the part of the victims. While they talked with the victims, Defendant B her her scam part of the victim F’s her mother, and Defendant B her her head was scambling with the victim’s her mother and her scambal with the victim’s her mother.

As a result, the Defendants shared the victims with a multi-lateral typology that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning interrogation of suspects of E or F by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Each injury diagnosis report (140 pages, 162 pages), each injury photo (148 pages, 170 pages), and each injury photo (170 pages) are sufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victims as stated in its reasoning. Considering the background of the instant crime, the method and degree of the assault committed by the Defendants, the above Defendant A’s act does not constitute legitimate defense.

Application of Statutes

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of a punishment) concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act