beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.11.29 2013고정1473

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car.

On May 23, 2013, at around 23:40, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with 0.157% of alcohol concentration, and continued to drive the said vehicle along the intersection of the new distance in the Pari-Eup in the Pari-Eup in the Pari-si in the Pari-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri.

At this point, traffic control is conducted by on-and-off lights, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to ensure the safety of course after temporarily stopping the road immediately before the intersection and checking well the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol as above, was driven by the victim C (the age of 52) driving the said intersection from the right side of the instant car by the yellow light flickering signal, which was driven by the victim C (the age of 52) who was driving the said intersection from the right side of the instant car by negligence, without temporarily stopping it, without neglecting it, and immediately stopping it.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C, such as salt ties and tensions, in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and injury to the victim E (the victim 26 years of age) who is the above taxi passenger, such as clocks, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol with approximately 5km alcohol concentration of about 0.157% at the section of about 5km from the 5km to the site of accident as referred to in paragraph (1), on which the trade name in the oil glass in the Seodaemun-gu Si, Seosan-gu, Sinsan-si, Sin-si, Gyeonggi-do, is unknown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A performance-based driver report and requests for appraisal;

1. Each written diagnosis;