However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, the Defendant: (b) around 22:0, while drinking alcohol with three parallels other than the victim E (43) and three parallels other than the Defendant, the victimized person was not involved in the Defendant’s usual speech to the daily behaviors; (c) on the ground that the damaged person was able to hold the examination, “after he was frighted,” the Defendant was hicked with the Kasle-beck’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and laid the part of the victim’s body once, and laid the victim’s face, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on investigation (or a relative investigation of a victim or witness);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury diagnostic certificate and diagnostic certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Quantity (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 53 and 55(1)3 of the Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 2, 2009; 209Da1448, Apr. 2, 201)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds for reduction of the amount of punishment);