If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The Defendant is engaged in driving a passenger car at Benz.

On January 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.154% around 05:50, and proceeded at an aesthetic speed depending on three-lanes on the side of the next hospital distance from the new active service-based 602-4, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a motor vehicle safely, such as making a good report on the traffic situation, accurately manipulating steering equipment, etc.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant did not so and did so, she did not avoid the victim’s car for the use of the victim’s launastet business, which was stopped in the same direction, and did not drive the taxi in the same direction, and concealed the back part on the left side of the vehicle by the Defendant’s front-hand part of the vehicle. The Defendant, due to the shock, she conflict with the part on the front-hand part of the vehicle of the e-driving 5 vehicle in which the accident was reported and stopped by the Defendant’s vehicle left behind.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business, suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood that requires four weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim G who was on board the back seat of the same vehicle, such as salt, tension, etc. requiring three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, at the time and time set forth in paragraph 1, driven a benz car at approximately 600 meters away from the front of the salt-gu restaurant, where it is impossible to find out whether the city located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City is located, to the road before the 602-4 No. 154% of the blood alcohol concentration, from the front of the restaurant to the road before the accident site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;