2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant led to the confession of and reflects on the crime; (b) the police officer does not want the punishment against the defendant; (c) it is deemed that there is a need to strictly punish the crime of interference with the performance of official duties in order to establish the state's legal order and eradicate the light of public authority; (d) the re-offending of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties during the period of repeated crime; (e) the defendant committed a large number of criminal records and criminal records; and (e) other matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, and other records and changes; and (e) the defendant's argument

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.