2. The Defendant consistently denies the facts charged from the investigative agency to this court, with the intent to flick the victim’s flock with the victim’s flock with the intent to flick the victim’s flock, and the victim’s flock with the victim’s flock with the intent to flick the victim’s flock with the victim’s flock with the Defendant’s flock with the Defendant

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the witness F’s legal statement and part of victim E’s legal statement, the fact that the victim walked on the way first left the way, and the Defendant did not receive it, but the victim continued to walk on the front door while coming to the Defendant (on the side of several right). Accordingly, the Defendant’s hand floor, with the intention of putting the way on the part of the victim’s left side (the rear side) one time, is recognized as a smuggling (after that, after that, the victim ended, she reported to the police as a sexual indecent act).

Comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the above act of the defendant, the attitude of the defendant's act, etc., part of the defendant's hand, such as the victim's statement, was her her but her son's her son(s) in this court, but her son was her son.

Even if her her her her m is not accurately known or lower than the her her her her m is not clear and her her mare, the Defendant had the intention to commit an indecent act against the Defendant at the time.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, prosecutor such as the victim's statement.