However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2020. 6. 26. 04:20경 청주시 흥덕구 B에 있는 C 앞 노상에서, ‘손님이 행패를 부리고 있다’는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 흥덕경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E과 경위 F에게 “집에 가고 싶으니 순찰차에 태워달라고”라고 요구하였으나 위 경찰관들로부터 “순찰차로 집에 데려다 줄 수는 없으니 택시를 타고 귀가하라”는 말을 듣고 이에 화가 나 위 경찰관들에게 "씹새끼야, 좃까지 말고 씨발 새끼야, 너 나이가 몇 살이냐 씨발 새끼야, 좃까지 말구, 나는 인제 막장이야"라고 욕설을 하며 순찰차의 앞을 가로막고 순찰차 차량의 보닛을 내리치는 등 약 5분간 유형력을 행사하며 순찰차의 진행을 방해하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and on-site dispatch affairs by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning video materials of patrol boxes and video materials for mobile phones taken by police officers in mobilization;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment except for a crime subject to a punishment once a fine is sentenced to a different type of crime, and the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and does not repeat the crime in the future and lives in good faith in the future, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and motive for the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments