2. Considering the various circumstances revealed in the arguments in this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual intercourse (no person before the same offense), environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unfasible and unfair, and thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is rejected.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.