However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 13, 2014, around 23:50 on June 13, 2014, the Defendant entering into a residence of the victims C and D (Inn, 44 years old) entered a gate in which the couple’s residence reside, and by the end, approximately 10 meters away from the victim’s residence.

2. In the above date, time, and place, the Defendant opened the toilet window used by the above victim D (n, 44 years old), which was on the right side of the house of the said victims, and opened the shower of the said D, and boomed it by hand, and continued to see it on June 14, 2014, at around 0:10 on June 14, 2014, the Defendant carried it up to the parking lot of the 1st floor of the same E-Ba, and carried it out by hand, and committed a publicly obscene act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement related to D or C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) and Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a lecture or an order to provide community service, which does not constitute an act of self-defense by intrusioning upon the victims' residential paralysis for the reason of sentencing under Article 16(2) and (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and does not agree with the victims. On the other hand, there is no criminal conviction of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor or more, and reflects the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc.