beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.09.11 2013고단977

경매방해등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 10,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

2. The defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On November 24, 2011, he/she was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. with Busan District Court on July 5, 2012, and the decision becomes final and conclusive on July 5, 2012, and is currently

◀2013고단977 피고인 A은 2011. 7. 4. 부산 해운대구 재송동 1133에 있는 부산지방법원 동부지원 사무실에서 D 소유인 부산 남구 E, F에 있는 G모텔 및 그 부지에 대한 위 법원 H 부동산 임의경매 사건에 관하여, 채권자 'I', 채무자 겸 소유자 'D‘, 유치권자 ’주식회사 J 대표이사 A‘이라고 기재하고, ’유치권자가 2010. 6.경 집주인의 동의하에 이 사건 건물에 대해 5억 원을 들여 실내 인테리어 공사를 하였고, 공사업자에게 위 공사대금을 전액 지급하였으니, 유치권을 신고함과 아울러 배당요구를 신청한다‘는 내용을 기재한 ‘유치권에 기한 권리신고 및 배당요구신청서’를 위 법원 담당 직원에게 제출하였다.

However, in the instant building, Defendant A did not have any construction work that could cause a lien as above while operating the telecom, and the expenses incurred in indoor interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior improvement, such as purchase of equipment irrelevant to the lien, etc., even though the amount of the construction cost incurred by Defendant B, who operated the tetrary business, did not amount to KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000 for construction cost, was falsely prepared as if Defendant B had been performing the construction work by taking over KRW 50,00,000 under a contract, and Defendant B prepared four copies of the deposit sheet of KRW 24,50,00,000,000 in total as

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit fraud to the fairness of auction.

◀2013고단1273 피고인 A은 2008. 9. 2. 피해자 K으로부터 모텔 경매사업과 관련하여 받은 8,000만 원 등으로 2008. 12. 3. 부산 서구 L에 있는 M 모텔을 경락받아 피고인 명의로...