beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.28 2014가합3075

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 104,207,536 as well as 5% per annum from October 15, 2012 to January 28, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the defendant is an intention to operate D's Council member in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the plaintiff is a person who has undergone a register lighting test by the defendant Council member.

B. On October 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant’s Council member for health examinations on October 15, 2012, and the radiation company E, upon the Defendant’s instruction, around 09:00 on the same day, shall conduct a general steering test against the Plaintiff at the Defendant’s radiation room (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

2) During the Plaintiff’s entry into the Plaintiff’s register and inserting air and steering agents into the Plaintiff’s register, the Plaintiff’s departure occurred in the Plaintiff’s resistance while complaining of the pain, and the Defendant confirmed the Plaintiff’s resistance and X-ray photograph, and judged the Plaintiff’s departure due to the shot, and made E continue the instant inspection.

3) E performed the instant inspection for about 30 minutes, and the Defendant diagnosed the result of the inspection that there is no special error in the Plaintiff’s register. C. After the inspection of this case, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant’s Council members on October 15, 2012 due to the symptoms of which the Plaintiff had clothes around 16:00 and which are not urines, and the Defendant discharged the urine by leaving the Plaintiff’s urine.

2) On October 15, 2012, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant’s Assembly member again due to the symptoms such as 20:00, and on the grounds that the Defendant retired, the Plaintiff released the Plaintiff’s cT examination at the direction of the Defendant on October 16, 2012. 3) The Plaintiff again returned to the Defendant’s Council member with the same symptoms around October 16, 2012, and again returned to the Defendant’s National Assembly member. The Defendant confirmed as a result of X-ray shooting that the cT examination was carried out to the upper half of the Plaintiff’s cT examination.

4 The defendant, through CT examination, re-verificationd that the breath of the plaintiff's breath with the view to the breath of the plaintiff's breath, conducts an emergency operation at the lutho Hospital of the Tol University.