When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of BCA110V.

On March 17, 2017, the Defendant driving the upper 22:00 on the upper otoba, and driving the 105-lane of the middle 105-lane of the middle YC Mung apartment at the 105-lane of the middle 102-lane of the middle 105-lane of the GYC shooting distance, 4-lane of the FYC Development Center.

At all times, the signal apparatus and crosswalk are installed on the front door, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in the driving of the off-to-road has a duty of care to check whether or not there is a person driving the crosswalk by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to prevent the accident by driving safely according to the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not stop on the front of the crosswalk, but did not stop on the front of the crosswalk, and caused the damage to the victim C(63 tax) who was standing on the left side of the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals in the direction of the defendant's direction by negligence and by negligence in violation of the signal, and left the road by taking the front part of the bicycle's driving on the front side of the driver's front side of the victim C(63 tax).

Defendant 1 suffered injury, such as damage to the side scarbs on the left side of the scarb, which requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the circumstances indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances and results of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.