beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.07.18 2013고정576

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director B.

1. Around 02:00 on October 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) entered the office of F of the head of the administrative department of the first floor of the E Hospital where the victim D in Asan City is a legal manager; and (b) made telephone conversations with the victim D and his bath and heavy interest; and (c) took two computer monitors at the victim’s market price on his/her book, which is equivalent to KRW 500,000,000, on his/her own, and damaged them.

2. Interference with business;

A. On December 24, 2012, at around 10:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s treatment services over 15 minutes by force, such as, in the course of the rehabilitation of the first floor of the same hospital and the outpatient treatment room of the first floor of the same hospital, the documents, which were cited by the victim D, such as “assumptive gue, chrogen gue, humanly the same impule,” and “assumed in the documents, the victim’s face would have been displayed.”

B. On the same day as Paragraph (a), the Defendant interfered with the hospital business by force, such as attaching an appeal at the entrance, etc. of the elevator and the entrance, etc. of the outpatients of the first floor of the hospital, and removing the appeal, by threatening the person with a large interest to die.

C. On January 10, 2013, at the same place as at around 19:00, the Defendant interfered with the hospital business by force for about 30 minutes, such as threatening the hospital employees, in a large lux with the removal of letters by lucing a blue car on the floor and glass hold of the first floor of the hospital.

On January 11, 2013, at around 01:50, the Defendant interfered with the hospital business by means of force for about 30 minutes, such as releasing letters on “in the exercise of the right of retention” in the same manner as in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph, and threatening the hospital staff.

E. On January 16, 2013, at the same place as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant puts a fluor card, which was written with the words “in the exercise of a right of retention,” using a red camera at the same time as the former paragraph, at the outside wall of a hospital emergency room.