However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:51 on October 22, 2014, in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and confirmed the Defendant’s contents of the report; (b) E, a police officer affiliated with the Dongdaemun Police Station D police box of Dongdaemun-gu Police Station, dispatched after receiving 112 reports to engage in illegal business; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties regarding crime prevention and suppression of the police officer, by cutting down the chest parts of the said police officer by hand; and (d) cutting down the ebbbbb

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend [Scope of Recommendation] No person who does not have the basic area (6-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and April) [Judgment of sentence] there is no record that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime; there is no reason for considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; there is a reason for considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; the crime committed under the influence of alcohol is a crime committed under the influence of alcohol; the defendant has a history of receiving mental treatment due to alcohol; and the defendant has a occupation and living environment