At around 16:00 on December 20, 2016, the Defendant was seated with a fenced on the floor of the ward in the Seoul Southern House M of the Seoul Southern-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of 865, the Defendant: (a) was inspecting the status of the settlement of inmates’ well-being and the living room; (b) “On the day, the time of the inspection,” and “the time of the inspection, after the time of the inspection, the Defendant’s walked on the wall while humping television, which was caused by the wall of the living room, was removed from the room by hand, and then damaged the television 1, which is goods used by public offices, by getting off the room several times on the floor and then damaging its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against O, P, or N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on television pictures damaged;

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, the reasons for sentencing of punishment [the scope of recommendation], the reason for sentencing of punishment [the scope of punishment], the reason for the invalidation and destruction of public goods (the invalidation of public goods) [the person with special sentencing] that there is no [the person with special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] contrary to the mistake [the decision of sentence], the compensation for part of the damaged television price, and the fact that the defendant can be seen to suffer from mental rehabilitation, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the decision of the sentencing guidelines, after exceeding the lower limit of the recommended sentencing guidelines.