When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At the defendant's house located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 601, the defendant owned 6 points of the total market value of 1,70,000 won.

On February 19, 2014, the enforcement officer C belonging to the Seoul Central District Court attached the said goods at the above place and attached a seizure mark on the said goods, based on the original execution recommendation decision of 2012Gau2820777 of the above court upon delegation of enforcement by creditor D.

However, around February 20, 2014, the Defendant removed without permission a seizure mark attached to the above goods at the above place.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the attachment indication that a public official performed in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Decision on recommendations for execution, execution clause, and report on inspection of seized objects by the Seoul Central District Court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to make phone statements E for reference);

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014); Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act