Prohibition (joint violence) and Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (public violence)

east Injury)

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인과 CIC, 이하 'C'이라 함), D(D, 이하 'D'라 함), 성명불상자(E, 이하 'E'라 함) 등 4명은 러시아 국적으로 피고인 측 일행이고, 피해자 F(F, 20세, 이하 'F'라 함), 피해자 G(G, 21세, 이하 'G'라 함), H(H, 20세, 이하 'H'이라 함) 등 3명은 러시아 국적으로 피해자 측 일행이다. 피고인과 그 일행은 2017. 7. 24. 04:00경 서울 중구 I에 있는 J 앞 외벽 벤치에서 이전 함께 술을 마셨던 피해자 G, H과 함께 이야기를 나누던 중, 피해자 G가 독수리 춤(러시아 전통춤)을 추는 것을 보고 피고인이 피해자 G에게 "독수리 춤이 아니라 병아리 춤이다"라고 말하면서 비아냥거리는 것을 기화로 시비가 되어, 피고인은 피해자 G를 밀어 넘어뜨리고 E는 주먹 등으로 피해자 G의 얼굴 등을 수회 때리고, D는 손으로 피해자 G의 목덜미를 잡아당기고, 이어 피고인 및 D, E는 주먹 등으로 이를 제지하던 H을 수회 때렀다. 계속하여 피고인과 그 일행은 같은 날 04:25 경 서울 중구 광희동1가 188-10에 있는 광희동 공중화장실 앞길로 H을 데리고 위와 같은 폭력행위를 피해 도망하던 피해자 G를 따라 이동한 후, 피해자 G의 도움 요청을 받은 피해자 F가 위 장소로 달려오는 것을 보고 피고인과 E는 H의 얼굴 등을 주먹 등으로 수회 때리고, 위 장소에 도착한 피해자 F가 피해자 G와 함께 D를 때리자 피고인과 E는 주먹과 발로 피해자 G와 피해자 F를 수회 때리고, D는 주먹으로 피해자 F를 수회 때리고, C은 발로 피해자 F를 2회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant jointly with C, D, and E, caused the victim F to be able to know the number of days of treatment, and assaulted the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and F, and the police statement made to K;

1. Report of internal investigation (a summary of the case), report of internal investigation (related to a suspect), CCTV investigation (brutly 17), report of internal investigation (brutly 24), report of internal investigation (verification of record of card use of a suspect), investigation report (brutly 29), investigation report (F counterpart investigation of a victim), results of short-term stay of foreigners (A), (A) investigation report (C) (C) (C) (44), closure photographs (related to investigation report (frut 2 and 3 damage), attachment photographs (C) (C) (C) (5), investigation report (frut 70), Seoul Central District Court Decision No. 2017 High Court Decision No. 70-17 High Court Decision No. 904 (C-17 witness examination), Defendant 71-17 witness examination (C-17 witness examination) (C-17 witness examination) and Defendant 71-17 witness examination in order (C-17 witness examination).

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to video recordings (CCTV video);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury, the choice of imprisonment), Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint violence, the choice of imprisonment)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. with the heavier punishment than the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishment of two crimes as provided for in the joint injury crime)

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following consideration for the reasons for sentencing):

1. Suspension of execution;

Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following grounds for sentencing has been repeatedly taken into consideration for favorable circumstances)

Reasons for sentencing

1. The scope of punishment by law;

From one month to nine years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

[Scope of Recommendation Form] General Injury 1 (General Injury) / Basic Field ( April to June)

【Special Convicted Person】

(b) A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

[Extent of Recommendation] Class 1 (General Violence) Basic Area (2-10 months)

【Special Convicted Person】

(c) Imprisonment with prison labor for a range of final sentence according to the standards for handling multiple crimes from April to November 1.

3. Determination of sentence;

In light of the background leading up to the instant crime committed by Defendant F and G as an organization at night, and the degree of injury inflicted upon Defendant F, etc. resulting therefrom, the Defendant’s nature of the crime is not weak.

However, there is a aspect that the victim provided the victim's vision, the defendant confessions the crime and reflects the depth of the crime, the defendant's primary offender is considered as favorable circumstances, and all other circumstances indicated in the records of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.

Judges Kim Gin-soo

Judges Kim Gin-young