beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.03.13 2019고정521

과실치상등

Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

On March 3, 2018, the Defendant was the relationship between the victim B (n, 60 years of age) and the victim B (n, D).

1. On May 18, 2019, the Defendant injured the victim by negligence, even though, on the street in front of the bus stops at the bus stops of the Jeju Urban Bus Terminal located in Seo-si, 174 (Oil-dong), from Jeju-si on May 18, 2019, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, due to the defect that the victim refused it and attempted to be mixed, the victim suffered from the injury of the victim, due to the negligence that caused the injury of the victim, which requires four weeks of treatment.

2. A intimidation: (a) around June 3, 2019, the Defendant sought the victim’s house at around 16:00, but the victim did not take part in the intrusion and did not take part in the victim’s cell, and (b) made a telephone again because the victim did not take part in the phone but did not take part in the phone, and (c) made intimidation to the victim on the ground that the victim’s body might be injured by the victim, such as “pon, deadly dead,” by phone call at the Defendant’s residence located in Jeju-si E on June 3, 2019.”

However, under Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 266 (2) of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 283 (2) of the above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against each victim's express intent under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement submitted by the victim to this court, the victim can be found to have explicitly expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on November 6, 2019. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.