2. In full view of various circumstances, including the fact that the amount acquired by the defendant through the crime of fraud of this case exceeds KRW 295 million, but the defendant does not make any effort to recover damage up to the present day, the victim wants to punish the defendant, the defendant has a history of having been sentenced to punishment or suspended execution on a multiple occasions due to fraud, etc., and thereby committing the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant, etc., the court below's punishment seems to be appropriate. Thus, the defendant's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.