Examining the record in light of the relevant legal principles, the lower court rejected the assertion that the Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and it is justifiable to have convicted the Defendant of the facts charged

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there are no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the burden of proof and the degree of proof in a political party act or criminal trial, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the burden of proof and the degree of proof, or by violating the defendant's right of defense.

Meanwhile, the argument that the defendant was subject to seizure by the investigative agency is not a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not regard it as the ground of appeal or the court below did not consider it as the subject of

In addition, even if we look at ex officio, there is no evidence that there is an error as alleged by the defendant in the investigation procedure.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.