A. Defendant B delivers the real estate listed in the separate sheet, and from August 24, 2014, the said real estate.

A. In full view of the purport of the pleadings as a whole, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B on April 18, 2014, setting the deposit amount of KRW 40 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.6 million, and the period from April 24, 2014 to April 14, 2016 with regard to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and thereafter, Defendant B was in arrears with monthly rent from August 24, 2014 to August 24, 2014. The Plaintiff is obligated to notify the Plaintiff of the termination of the above lease agreement on the ground that monthly rent of rent of KRW 1,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 160,000, and the real estate in this case was delivered to Defendant B by November 25, 2014; Defendant B had the duty to lawfully reside in the aforementioned real estate at the rate of KRW 14,014.

B. As to this, Defendant B’s assertion that it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s claim because there still exist a large number of deposits for the lease and efforts to pay the overdue monthly rent. However, Defendant B’s above ground cannot be a legitimate ground for defense against the Plaintiff’s claim, and thus, it cannot be accepted.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.